The plaintiffs, which include 14 US states, argue that Elon Musk’s role in leading DOGE is unconstitutional because he was not approved by the Senate. The plaintiffs also ask to prevent DOGE from accessing data from seven federal agencies.
However, Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected the requests, saying that the lawsuits from the states failed to prove that Mr. Musk and DOGE's activities caused "irreparable harm," The Hill reported on February 18.
Billionaire Elon Musk and his son at the White House on February 11
“The court cannot issue a temporary restraining order (TRO), especially a broad injunction request from a plaintiff, without clear evidence of immediate or irreparable harm,” said Ms. Chutkhan.
The judge added that the plaintiffs had asked the court to consider media reports indicating that DOGE had or would soon take actions such as mass terminations. “The court cannot act on media reports. What I have heard is clearly concerning, but I need to have the reports and find out the facts before making a decision,” Ms. Chutkhan told ABC News.
On February 17, the White House announced that Mr. Elon Musk is not an employee of DOGE and does not have the authority to lead this agency, but the billionaire holds the position of advisor to US President Donald Trump.
DOGE faces legal challenges as it moves to cut thousands of staff and budgets from government agencies. In a recent development, Reuters reported on February 17 that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) employees responsible for evaluating Elon Musk's Neuralink Company (specializing in brain implants) have been fired .
Source: https://thanhnien.vn/tham-phan-bac-yeu-cau-ngan-ong-elon-musk-doge-sa-thai-nhan-su-hang-loat-185250219065734401.htm
Comment (0)